- From: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:34:28 +0100
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>
- Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 02:10:39PM +0000, Mark Birbeck wrote: > The resolution from that meeting was actually to decouple the RDFa and > CURIEs specifications. The part you are linking to about making a > decision in December appeared earlier in the discussion, before that > decision was made. My understanding was in fact that the specifications would be decoupled - I just wanted to confirm that the release of [3] has not changed those plans. Thanks, Tom > > Regards, > > Mark > > On 10/12/2007, Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de> wrote: > > > > In Amsterdam, it was noted [1] that a decision needed to be > > taken in December on whether to keep the section on CURIEs > > [2] in the spec or not. I see that in the meantime, CURIE > > Syntax 1.0 has been released [3]. > > > > What is the current plan? > > > > Tom > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-irc#T07-52-52 > > [2] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-rdfa-syntax-20070927/#s_curies > > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-curie-20071126/ > > > > -- > > Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de> > > W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/ > > > > > > > > > -- > Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer > > mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 > http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com > > standards. innovation. -- Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de> W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/
Received on Monday, 10 December 2007 14:36:09 UTC