Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules

Manu Sporny wrote:
> Do we care that we have to repeat ourselves for IMG?

Yes, DRY is an important requirement whenever we can make it work.

> It seems as if we're going to great lengths to support @src

Really? I didn't think so. I think we just realized that it was much
easier to support in the "right" way given the new chaining rules. The
parsing rules are also only very slightly modified. Maybe two lines of code.

I think we should be thinking about this issue separately from what Mark
brought up regarding @resource acting like the subject.

-Ben

Received on Thursday, 20 December 2007 16:03:27 UTC