- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 10:35:43 +0000
- To: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Cc: "Danny Ayers" <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:22:48 +0000 "Mark Birbeck" wrote: > Up until now we've all been happy with the use of @profile, but on further > examination it turns out to be a bending of the use of @profile Two points: 1) Since you're already extending XHTML by adding new attributes, why can't you extend the meaning of an existing attribute? You have the power. This is somewhat like the fact that if DOCTYPE is required, then @profile or whatever discovery mechanism can also be required. Once you make an argument for something, the ramifications may help you elsewhere too. 2) GRDDL uses @profile in http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/#profile-bind without providing any semantics for document internal vocabulary items such as @rel values. Do you think this section of GRDDL violates XHTML's definition of @profile, as defined in HTML 4.01? You may be able to reuse the GRDDL WG's justification of their @profile extension in RDFa. -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Saturday, 15 December 2007 10:36:03 UTC