Revelytix R2RML preview
Minutes of 2011-03-29 telecon
Test cases - current status and next steps
RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC
Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping
- Re: Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping
- Re: Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping
- [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping
Re: Fwd: R2RML ready for publication
Issues mentioned in R2RML draft
R2RML ready for publication
ISSUE-39 (refactor-common-props): Refactor R2RML spec to avoid duplicate definitions [R2RML]
ISSUE-38 (execution-environment): What is provided by the R2RML execution environment? [R2RML]
ISSUE-37 (connection-in-mapping): Allow specifying DB connection details in the R2RML mapping
ISSUE-36 (schema-triples): â??Terminology-levelâ?? triples as part of R2RML mapping output [R2RML]
R2RML 2nd draft => ACTION-112: DONE
Minutes for March 22 Telcon
ISSUE-35 (case sensitivity): Case sensitivity of SQL identifiers [R2RML]
ISSUE-34: R2RML terminology: addressing vendor-specific names like "owner" [R2RML]
RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC
R2RML terminology: table or view name plus its owner name
“Default” vs “unnamed” graph
- Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph
- Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph
- Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph
Attempted to address blank node issue in R2RML draft
SemTech London (ACTION-101)
Minutes of 2011-03-15 telecon
R2RML: generating subject's class from input data
RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC
Test cases to check - including TC for ISSUE-28
R2RML Linked Data Aspects
R2RML: publishing the second draft
Test issue: @base syntax
ISSUE-33 (rr:template type in ObjectMapClass): How can rr:template be used in an ObjectMapClass to produce IRI's or Strings [R2RML]
ISSUE-32 (curly braces in joinCondition): Remove the use of curly braces in joinCondition [R2RML]
Default Graph Contents
Minutes of 2011-03-08 telecon
changes between R2RML v1.38 and v1.40 drafts
temporal nature of T-box (and A-box), and why bNodes should rarely (if ever!) be used
- Re: temporal nature of T-box (and A-box), and why bNodes should rarely (if ever!) be used
- Re: temporal nature of T-box (and A-box), and why bNodes should rarely (if ever!) be used
- Re: temporal nature of T-box (and A-box), and why bNodes should rarely (if ever!) be used
Heads-up re telecon meeting time 15 and 22 Mar 2011
ISSUE-31 (blank node identifier spec reference): Clarify reference to "blank node label" [R2RML]
ISSUE-30 (different blank node identifier): Different blank node identifier than was defined in mapping [R2RML]
ISSUE-29 (resource identifiers as strings): Require blank node and IRI identifier expressions to produce strings [R2RML]
Test case identification
ISSUE-28 (equivalent blank nodes): Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier [R2RML]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (equivalent blank nodes): Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier [R2RML]