- From: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:48:47 -0500
- To: Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name>
- Cc: RDB2RDF Working Group WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 21 March 2011 15:49:23 UTC
Alex - This test looks useful. This raises the question of how to verify the test results for TriplesMaps that produce blank nodes. It seems to me that a test harness for executing the test cases will need to ignore the blank node identifiers used (since an implementation is free to generate any blank node identifiers). Do we expect that a test harness will be created by the working group? -David On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name>wrote: > Created a basic test case for this: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_Test_Cases_v1#DB26 > > Alex > > On 07/03/2011, at 17:02, RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > > > > ISSUE-28 (equivalent blank nodes): Clarify whether blank nodes are > equivalent based on their identifier [R2RML] >
Received on Monday, 21 March 2011 15:49:23 UTC