- From: Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:24:07 +0100
- To: Robert Scanlon <rscanlon@revelytix.com>
- Cc: bvillazon@fi.upm.es, Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <7527A436-40B8-4460-9E23-02E613E749DD@alexdeleon.name>
Thanks for the comments Robert. I changed to a different drawing tool because Violet UML wasn't exporting to PNG properly. That's why there were missing properties. The last version of the diagram is now available from http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3663220/RDB2RDF/R2RML.png Regards, Alex On 15/03/2011, at 20:24, Robert Scanlon wrote: > fyi, just noticed these also: > • TripleMapClass should be TriplesMapClass > • parentTripleMap should be parentTriplesMap > Bob Scanlon > Revelytix > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Boris Villazón Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es> wrote: > Hi Robert, Souri > > Alex modified the image following your comments > > http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png > > Souri, I'll update the images, I'll try to do it by tonight > > Best > > Boris > > > > > > On 15/03/2011 15:59, Robert Scanlon wrote: >> Hi Alexander, >> >> This looks very good. Here's a few comments/suggestions: >> • It looks like tableOwner is missing in TripleMapClass -- that should be an optional property, per ISSUE-23 >> • It looks like inverseExpression is missing in SubjectMapClass and ObjectMapClass; suggest inserting above graph properties to keep those together at the end or property listings (it's in PredicateMapClas but without a range) >> • RefObjectMapClass.joinCondition range is a string (currently missing) >> • Suggest moving template up under column in SubjectMapClass and ObjectMapClass, for aesthetic reasons (it's one of 3 alternatives to specify a subject or object, the other 2 are at the top of the property list) >> >> Bob Scanlon >> Revelytix >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name> wrote: >> Hi >> I created a UML class diagram of the R2RML syntax: http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png >> >> Any comments/corrections? >> >> Alex >> >> On 15/03/2011, at 00:25, Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote: >> >> > Hi Souri >> > >> > On 14/03/2011 17:21, Souripriya Das wrote: >> >> Latest Editors' draft (v 1.42): http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/ >> >> >> >> Worked on the R2RML document to address the following issues to make it ready for publishing: >> >> • Issue-22: added note to Sec 1.3 >> >> • Issue-24: changed "child." to "{child.}" and added a note about allowing complex join conditons. >> >> • Issue-26: added rr:unnamedGraph IRI as a possible value for rr:graph property to indicate that the generated triples should be stored in the unnamed graph (besides storing them into specified named graphs, if any). >> >> • Issue-31: Changed "blank node label" to "blank node identifier" >> >> Issues to be addressed: >> >> • Figures need to be consistent with the current text. (Boris, could you please upload the latest figures or send us the pointers.) >> > I will upload the figures, once I update them. >> > In addition, Alex is creating a new figure that describes the R2RML specification, we will send you this figure. >> > >> >> • Issue-28: Needs a test case. (Boris, could you please add a test case.) >> > Done, in a previous "Test Cases" email. >> > >> > Boris >> >> > >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 23:24:44 UTC