public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from March 2011 by author

Alexander De Leon

• Re: R2RML: generating subject's class from input data (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft (Tuesday, 15 March)
• R2RML: generating subject's class from input data (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: ISSUE-28 (equivalent blank nodes): Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier [R2RML] (Monday, 14 March)

Alexandre Bertails

• [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping (Thursday, 24 March)
• Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: temporal nature of T-box (and A-box), and why bNodes should rarely (if ever!) be used (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-08 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 1 March)

ashok malhotra

• Minutes for March 22 Telcon (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: SemTech London (ACTION-101) (Tuesday, 15 March)

Boris Villazón Terrazas

• Test cases - current status and next steps (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft (Monday, 14 March)
• Test cases to check - including TC for ISSUE-28 (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: Test issue: @base syntax (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: Test case identification (Tuesday, 8 March)

David McNeil

• Revelytix R2RML preview (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: ISSUE-28 (equivalent blank nodes): Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier [R2RML] (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Test issue: @base syntax (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: ISSUE-32 (curly braces in joinCondition): Remove the use of curly braces in joinCondition [R2RML] (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: Default Graph Contents (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Default Graph Contents (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: Test site broken? (Friday, 4 March)
• Test site broken? (Friday, 4 March)

Enrico Franconi

• Re: temporal nature of T-box (and A-box), and why bNodes should rarely (if ever!) be used (Tuesday, 8 March)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: ISSUE-28 (equivalent blank nodes): Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier [R2RML] (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: Minutes of 2011-03-15 telecon (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: Default Graph Contents (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: Test case identification (Tuesday, 8 March)

Hausenblas, Michael

• Re: R2RML terminology: table or view name plus its owner name (Thursday, 17 March)
• Minutes of 2011-03-08 telecon (Tuesday, 8 March)

Ivan Herman

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: R2RML ready for publication (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: SemTech London (ACTION-101) (Wednesday, 16 March)
• SemTech London (ACTION-101) (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: Default Graph Contents (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: temporal nature of T-box (and A-box), and why bNodes should rarely (if ever!) be used (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Test site broken? (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 1 March)

Juan Sequeda

• Re: [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: SemTech London (ACTION-101) (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 1 March)

Lee Feigenbaum

• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph (Wednesday, 16 March)

Marcelo Arenas

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 15 March)

Michael Hausenblas

• Minutes of 2011-03-29 telecon (Tuesday, 29 March)
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Minutes for March 22 Telcon (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Monday, 21 March)
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: SemTech London (ACTION-101) (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Minutes of 2011-03-15 telecon (Tuesday, 15 March)
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Heads-up re telecon meeting time 15 and 22 Mar 2011 (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-08 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 8 March)
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-08 meeting 1700 UTC (Sunday, 6 March)
• Minutes of 2011-03-01 telecon (Tuesday, 1 March)
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 1 March)

Nuno Lopes

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 1 March)

Percy Enrique Rivera Salas

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 1 March)

RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-39 (refactor-common-props): Refactor R2RML spec to avoid duplicate definitions [R2RML] (Tuesday, 22 March)
• ISSUE-38 (execution-environment): What is provided by the R2RML execution environment? [R2RML] (Tuesday, 22 March)
• ISSUE-37 (connection-in-mapping): Allow specifying DB connection details in the R2RML mapping (Tuesday, 22 March)
• ISSUE-36 (schema-triples): �??Terminology-level�?? triples as part of R2RML mapping output [R2RML] (Tuesday, 22 March)
• ISSUE-35 (case sensitivity): Case sensitivity of SQL identifiers [R2RML] (Tuesday, 22 March)
• ISSUE-34: R2RML terminology: addressing vendor-specific names like "owner" [R2RML] (Tuesday, 22 March)
• ISSUE-33 (rr:template type in ObjectMapClass): How can rr:template be used in an ObjectMapClass to produce IRI's or Strings [R2RML] (Thursday, 10 March)
• ISSUE-32 (curly braces in joinCondition): Remove the use of curly braces in joinCondition [R2RML] (Thursday, 10 March)
• ISSUE-31 (blank node identifier spec reference): Clarify reference to "blank node label" [R2RML] (Monday, 7 March)
• ISSUE-30 (different blank node identifier): Different blank node identifier than was defined in mapping [R2RML] (Monday, 7 March)
• ISSUE-29 (resource identifiers as strings): Require blank node and IRI identifier expressions to produce strings [R2RML] (Monday, 7 March)
• ISSUE-28 (equivalent blank nodes): Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier [R2RML] (Monday, 7 March)
• ISSUE-27 (unnamed graph?): NULL graphColumn value producing triples in an unnamed graph [R2RML] (Wednesday, 2 March)
• ISSUE-26 (Named graphs and default graph): Producing triples in named graphs and the default graph [R2RML] (Wednesday, 2 March)
• ISSUE-25 (Direct mapping in custom mappings): Including direct mapping constructs in R2RML mappings (Tuesday, 1 March)
• ISSUE-24 (Complex joinConditions): Clarify support for complex joinConditions [R2RML] (Tuesday, 1 March)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: R2RML ready for publication (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Issues mentioned in R2RML draft (Tuesday, 22 March)
• R2RML ready for publication (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-28 (equivalent blank nodes): Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier [R2RML] (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: Attempted to address blank node issue in R2RML draft (Monday, 21 March)
• “Default” vs “unnamed” graph (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Attempted to address blank node issue in R2RML draft (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML: generating subject's class from input data (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects (Tuesday, 15 March)

Robert Scanlon

• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: Attempted to address blank node issue in R2RML draft (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Test case identification (Monday, 7 March)

Souripriya Das

• Re: Fwd: R2RML ready for publication (Wednesday, 23 March)
• R2RML 2nd draft => ACTION-112: DONE (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Sunday, 20 March)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML: generating subject's class from input data (Tuesday, 15 March)
• R2RML: publishing the second draft (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: Default Graph Contents (Wednesday, 9 March)
• changes between R2RML v1.38 and v1.40 drafts (Tuesday, 8 March)

Sören Auer

• R2RML terminology: table or view name plus its owner name (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects (Monday, 14 March)
• R2RML Linked Data Aspects (Monday, 14 March)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• temporal nature of T-box (and A-box), and why bNodes should rarely (if ever!) be used (Tuesday, 8 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 March 2011 17:53:58 UTC