Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft

Hi Robert, Souri

Alex modified the image following your comments
http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png

Souri, I'll update the images, I'll try to do it by tonight

Best

Boris




On 15/03/2011 15:59, Robert Scanlon wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> This looks very good.  Here's a few comments/suggestions:
>
>     * It looks like tableOwner is missing in TripleMapClass -- that
>       should be an optional property, per ISSUE-23
>     * It looks like inverseExpression is missing in SubjectMapClass
>       and ObjectMapClass; suggest inserting above graph properties to
>       keep those together at the end or property listings  (it's in
>       PredicateMapClas but without a range)
>     * RefObjectMapClass.joinCondition range is a string (currently
>       missing)
>     * Suggest moving template up under column in SubjectMapClass and
>       ObjectMapClass, for aesthetic reasons (it's one of 3
>       alternatives to specify a subject or object, the other 2 are at
>       the top of the property list)
>
>
> Bob Scanlon
> Revelytix
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name 
> <mailto:me@alexdeleon.name>> wrote:
>
>     Hi
>     I created a UML class diagram of the R2RML syntax:
>     http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png
>
>     Any comments/corrections?
>
>     Alex
>
>     On 15/03/2011, at 00:25, Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote:
>
>     > Hi Souri
>     >
>     > On 14/03/2011 17:21, Souripriya Das wrote:
>     >> Latest Editors' draft (v 1.42):
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/
>     >>
>     >> Worked on the R2RML document to address the following issues to
>     make it ready for publishing:
>     >>      • Issue-22: added note to Sec 1.3
>     >>      • Issue-24: changed "child." to "{child.}" and added a
>     note about allowing complex join conditons.
>     >>      • Issue-26: added rr:unnamedGraph IRI as a possible value
>     for rr:graph property to indicate that the generated triples
>     should be stored in the unnamed graph (besides storing them into
>     specified named graphs, if any).
>     >>      • Issue-31: Changed "blank node label" to "blank node
>     identifier"
>     >> Issues to be addressed:
>     >>      • Figures need to be consistent with the current text.
>     (Boris, could you please upload the latest figures or send us the
>     pointers.)
>     > I will upload the figures, once I update them.
>     > In addition, Alex is creating a new figure that describes the
>     R2RML specification, we will send you this figure.
>     >
>     >>      • Issue-28: Needs a test case. (Boris, could you please
>     add a test case.)
>     > Done, in a previous "Test Cases" email.
>     >
>     > Boris
>
>