- From: Boris Villazón Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:25:05 +0100
- To: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
- CC: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 14 March 2011 23:25:35 UTC
Hi Souri
On 14/03/2011 17:21, Souripriya Das wrote:
> Latest Editors' draft (v 1.42): http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/
>
> Worked on the R2RML document to address the following issues to make
> it ready for publishing:
>
> * Issue-22: added note to Sec 1.3
> * Issue-24: changed "child." to "{child.}" and added a note about
> allowing complex join conditons.
> * Issue-26: added rr:unnamedGraph IRI as a possible value for
> rr:graph property to indicate that the generated triples should
> be stored in the unnamed graph (besides storing them into
> specified named graphs, if any).
> * Issue-31: Changed "blank node label" to "blank node identifier"
>
> Issues to be addressed:
>
> * Figures need to be consistent with the current text. (Boris,
> could you please upload the latest figures or send us the pointers.)
>
I will upload the figures, once I update them.
In addition, Alex is creating a new figure that describes the R2RML
specification, we will send you this figure.
> * Issue-28: Needs a test case. (Boris, could you please add a test
> case.)
>
Done, in a previous "Test Cases" email.
Boris
Received on Monday, 14 March 2011 23:25:35 UTC