- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:12:24 +0000
- To: Sören Auer <auer@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Cc: "RDB2RDF WG" <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
I think Soeren has a point there. /me back to Paddy's day ;) Cheers, Michael Sent from my iPad On 17 Mar 2011, at 17:47, Sören Auer <auer@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > While reading the current R2RML draft I often encounter sentences like > "table or view name plus its owner name" (e.g. first sentence of 3.3 > [1]). This sounds a little odd to me (and maybe Oracle vendor specific). > I have the impression what is meant here is database schema name [2]. > This however, appears to be always a little vendor specific. Hence, I > would suggest to omit the "owner name" completely throughout the > document and maybe add a note in the terminology section saying that "by > table or view name we always mean the complete name required for the > DBMS to identify the object. For some DBMS this includes a schema/owner > (Oracle) or database (MySQL) prefix." > > If I did not misunderstand anything here completely I will create an > issue for this (which probably is not mission critical for now). > > Sören > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-r2rml-20101028/r2 > [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema_object >
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2011 18:05:43 UTC