- From: RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:21:21 +0000
- To: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-31 (blank node identifier spec reference): Clarify reference to "blank node label" [R2RML] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/31 Raised by: David McNeil On product: R2RML This is a minor point, and I may be wrong so I defer to those with greater knowledge of the RDF specs, but... The R2RML spec makes a reference to a "blank node label". Based on my understanding of the specs it would make more sense to refer to a "blank node identifier". Also, I think it would be useful, earlier in the spec to define that when a mapping produces a blank node that the data value (either a literal from the mapping, a column value from the database, or the result of a template) is to be the blank node identifier and include a reference to an RDF spec that defines the meaning of the term "blank node identifier" (e.g. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#dfn-blank-node-id)
Received on Monday, 7 March 2011 16:21:23 UTC