- From: Robert Scanlon <rscanlon@revelytix.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:24:01 -0500
- To: bvillazon@fi.upm.es, Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name>
- Cc: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTikxNt3w+s+ZOs8fsvRWBv=vxwB-gAO6RE7GJh0M@mail.gmail.com>
fyi, just noticed these also: - TripleMapClass should be TriplesMapClass - parentTripleMap should be parentTriplesMap Bob Scanlon Revelytix On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Boris Villazón Terrazas < bvillazon@fi.upm.es> wrote: > Hi Robert, Souri > > Alex modified the image following your comments > > http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png > > Souri, I'll update the images, I'll try to do it by tonight > > Best > > Boris > > > > > > On 15/03/2011 15:59, Robert Scanlon wrote: > > Hi Alexander, > > This looks very good. Here's a few comments/suggestions: > > - It looks like tableOwner is missing in TripleMapClass -- that should > be an optional property, per ISSUE-23 > - It looks like inverseExpression is missing in SubjectMapClass and > ObjectMapClass; suggest inserting above graph properties to keep those > together at the end or property listings (it's in PredicateMapClas but > without a range) > - RefObjectMapClass.joinCondition range is a string (currently missing) > - Suggest moving template up under column in SubjectMapClass and > ObjectMapClass, for aesthetic reasons (it's one of 3 alternatives to specify > a subject or object, the other 2 are at the top of the property list) > > > Bob Scanlon > Revelytix > > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name>wrote: > >> Hi >> I created a UML class diagram of the R2RML syntax: >> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png >> >> Any comments/corrections? >> >> Alex >> >> On 15/03/2011, at 00:25, Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote: >> >> > Hi Souri >> > >> > On 14/03/2011 17:21, Souripriya Das wrote: >> >> Latest Editors' draft (v 1.42): >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/ >> >> >> >> Worked on the R2RML document to address the following issues to make it >> ready for publishing: >> >> • Issue-22: added note to Sec 1.3 >> >> • Issue-24: changed "child." to "{child.}" and added a note about >> allowing complex join conditons. >> >> • Issue-26: added rr:unnamedGraph IRI as a possible value for >> rr:graph property to indicate that the generated triples should be stored in >> the unnamed graph (besides storing them into specified named graphs, if >> any). >> >> • Issue-31: Changed "blank node label" to "blank node identifier" >> >> Issues to be addressed: >> >> • Figures need to be consistent with the current text. (Boris, >> could you please upload the latest figures or send us the pointers.) >> > I will upload the figures, once I update them. >> > In addition, Alex is creating a new figure that describes the R2RML >> specification, we will send you this figure. >> > >> >> • Issue-28: Needs a test case. (Boris, could you please add a test >> case.) >> > Done, in a previous "Test Cases" email. >> > >> > Boris >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 19:24:40 UTC