- From: Robert Scanlon <rscanlon@revelytix.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:24:01 -0500
- To: bvillazon@fi.upm.es, Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name>
- Cc: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTikxNt3w+s+ZOs8fsvRWBv=vxwB-gAO6RE7GJh0M@mail.gmail.com>
fyi, just noticed these also:
- TripleMapClass should be TriplesMapClass
- parentTripleMap should be parentTriplesMap
Bob Scanlon
Revelytix
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Boris Villazón Terrazas <
bvillazon@fi.upm.es> wrote:
> Hi Robert, Souri
>
> Alex modified the image following your comments
>
> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png
>
> Souri, I'll update the images, I'll try to do it by tonight
>
> Best
>
> Boris
>
>
>
>
>
> On 15/03/2011 15:59, Robert Scanlon wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> This looks very good. Here's a few comments/suggestions:
>
> - It looks like tableOwner is missing in TripleMapClass -- that should
> be an optional property, per ISSUE-23
> - It looks like inverseExpression is missing in SubjectMapClass and
> ObjectMapClass; suggest inserting above graph properties to keep those
> together at the end or property listings (it's in PredicateMapClas but
> without a range)
> - RefObjectMapClass.joinCondition range is a string (currently missing)
> - Suggest moving template up under column in SubjectMapClass and
> ObjectMapClass, for aesthetic reasons (it's one of 3 alternatives to specify
> a subject or object, the other 2 are at the top of the property list)
>
>
> Bob Scanlon
> Revelytix
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name>wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> I created a UML class diagram of the R2RML syntax:
>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png
>>
>> Any comments/corrections?
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On 15/03/2011, at 00:25, Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Souri
>> >
>> > On 14/03/2011 17:21, Souripriya Das wrote:
>> >> Latest Editors' draft (v 1.42):
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/
>> >>
>> >> Worked on the R2RML document to address the following issues to make it
>> ready for publishing:
>> >> • Issue-22: added note to Sec 1.3
>> >> • Issue-24: changed "child." to "{child.}" and added a note about
>> allowing complex join conditons.
>> >> • Issue-26: added rr:unnamedGraph IRI as a possible value for
>> rr:graph property to indicate that the generated triples should be stored in
>> the unnamed graph (besides storing them into specified named graphs, if
>> any).
>> >> • Issue-31: Changed "blank node label" to "blank node identifier"
>> >> Issues to be addressed:
>> >> • Figures need to be consistent with the current text. (Boris,
>> could you please upload the latest figures or send us the pointers.)
>> > I will upload the figures, once I update them.
>> > In addition, Alex is creating a new figure that describes the R2RML
>> specification, we will send you this figure.
>> >
>> >> • Issue-28: Needs a test case. (Boris, could you please add a test
>> case.)
>> > Done, in a previous "Test Cases" email.
>> >
>> > Boris
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 19:24:40 UTC