- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:34:14 +0000
- To: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
- Cc: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
On 15 Mar 2011, at 15:18, Souripriya Das wrote: > You have raised a good point, but we think the capability of using class template or class column is already possible using the current constructs. How about adding a short explanation to the rr:class section: “Note: This property is merely a shortcut for specifying an rr:predicateObjectMap with predicate rdf:type and the class URI as rr:object. To achieve a mapping where the class URI is not constant but needs to be computed based on the contents of the database, one can explicitly define an rr:predicateObjectMap with a non-constant rr:objectMap.” Best, Richard > > For example, > ... > rr:classTemplate " > http://example.com/ontology/{Type > }"'; > ... > > can be replaced with > > rr:predicateObjectMap > [ > rr:predicateMap [ rr:predicate rdf:type ]; > rr:objectMap [ rr:template " > http://example.com/ontology/{Type > }" ; rr:termType "IRI" ] > ]; > > > > Thanks, > - Souri/Seema. > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 15:34:46 UTC