- From: Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:01:58 +0100
- To: bvillazon@fi.upm.es
- Cc: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 11:10:00 UTC
Hi I created a UML class diagram of the R2RML syntax: http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png Any comments/corrections? Alex On 15/03/2011, at 00:25, Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote: > Hi Souri > > On 14/03/2011 17:21, Souripriya Das wrote: >> Latest Editors' draft (v 1.42): http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/ >> >> Worked on the R2RML document to address the following issues to make it ready for publishing: >> • Issue-22: added note to Sec 1.3 >> • Issue-24: changed "child." to "{child.}" and added a note about allowing complex join conditons. >> • Issue-26: added rr:unnamedGraph IRI as a possible value for rr:graph property to indicate that the generated triples should be stored in the unnamed graph (besides storing them into specified named graphs, if any). >> • Issue-31: Changed "blank node label" to "blank node identifier" >> Issues to be addressed: >> • Figures need to be consistent with the current text. (Boris, could you please upload the latest figures or send us the pointers.) > I will upload the figures, once I update them. > In addition, Alex is creating a new figure that describes the R2RML specification, we will send you this figure. > >> • Issue-28: Needs a test case. (Boris, could you please add a test case.) > Done, in a previous "Test Cases" email. > > Boris
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 11:10:00 UTC