- From: Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:01:58 +0100
- To: bvillazon@fi.upm.es
- Cc: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 11:10:00 UTC
Hi
I created a UML class diagram of the R2RML syntax: http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png
Any comments/corrections?
Alex
On 15/03/2011, at 00:25, Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote:
> Hi Souri
>
> On 14/03/2011 17:21, Souripriya Das wrote:
>> Latest Editors' draft (v 1.42): http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/
>>
>> Worked on the R2RML document to address the following issues to make it ready for publishing:
>> • Issue-22: added note to Sec 1.3
>> • Issue-24: changed "child." to "{child.}" and added a note about allowing complex join conditons.
>> • Issue-26: added rr:unnamedGraph IRI as a possible value for rr:graph property to indicate that the generated triples should be stored in the unnamed graph (besides storing them into specified named graphs, if any).
>> • Issue-31: Changed "blank node label" to "blank node identifier"
>> Issues to be addressed:
>> • Figures need to be consistent with the current text. (Boris, could you please upload the latest figures or send us the pointers.)
> I will upload the figures, once I update them.
> In addition, Alex is creating a new figure that describes the R2RML specification, we will send you this figure.
>
>> • Issue-28: Needs a test case. (Boris, could you please add a test case.)
> Done, in a previous "Test Cases" email.
>
> Boris
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 11:10:00 UTC