- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:30:06 +0100
- To: Sören Auer <auer@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <F9AD01AE-9859-4B21-9919-5275480BC64D@w3.org>
On Mar 14, 2011, at 23:35 , Sören Auer wrote: > Am 14.03.2011 18:55, schrieb Ivan Herman: >>> 2. *namespaces* - I could not find any possibility to declare namespaces >>> and respective prefixes in the current draft. is that left out >>> intentionally? If not, we should add a respective declaration and make >>> clear, that only namespaces which are governed by the user creating the >>> mapping can be made de-referencable later on for Linked Data publishing. >>> >> >> I just want to understand: do you mean namespaces to be used within an R2RML file or namespaces and prefixes in the generated file? >> >> I am not sure I understand the need for the former; I suspect this is not what you meant. >> >> As for the latter: my understanding is that R2RML defines a way to generate RDF triples from tables. I mean: RDF triples in the abstract, conceptual sense, and not in any particular serialization. On the other hand, the usage of prefixes/namespaces is a matter of a particular serialization; I am not sure it has a place in R2RML... > > In some literal values of R2RML properties (such as e.g. rr:SQLQuery) > (as well as inside some tables) it would make sense to use CURIE-like > identifiers. Currently it looks like it is left unclear, wether this is > possible and what namespaces will be used. From my point of view we need > at least two distinguished default namespaces - one for schema elements > (i.e. classen and properties) which are generated by R2RML and one for > the actual data. Well, that is what I am questioning, in fact. *RDF* does not have a concept of namespaces, only serializations do. And the different serializations (RDF/XML, Turtle, RDFa, soon JSON) may have different approaches. R2RML does not define which serialization is used at the end of the process... Ivan > In addition it should be possible to define and use > more namespace prefixes. > > Maybe also I got something wrong. ;-) > > Sören > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 10:28:06 UTC