- From: RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:13:51 +0000
- To: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-30 (different blank node identifier): Different blank node identifier than was defined in mapping [R2RML] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/30 Raised by: David McNeil On product: R2RML Clarify in the spec that it is acceptable for an implementation to produce triples with blank node identifiers that are different than that defined by the mapping. i.e. the user cannot anticipate the specific blank node identifier that will be used for a given resource. I believe this is a necessary as a result of re-allocating blank node identifiers to preserve the distinction between blank nodes with the same identifier created in different graphs.
Received on Monday, 7 March 2011 16:13:52 UTC