Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft

Hi Souri

I updated the figures on the repository. They should be ok now ... 
apologies for the delay.
I also included the UML class diagram (R2RML.png), so you can include it 
into the document, probably at the beginning.

Thanks

Boris


On 16/03/2011 0:24, Alexander De Leon wrote:
> Thanks for the comments Robert.
> I changed to a different drawing tool because Violet UML wasn't exporting to PNG properly. That's why there were missing properties.
>
> The last version of the diagram is now available from http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3663220/RDB2RDF/R2RML.png
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
>
> On 15/03/2011, at 20:24, Robert Scanlon wrote:
>
>> fyi, just noticed these also:
>> 	• TripleMapClass should be TriplesMapClass
>> 	• parentTripleMap should be parentTriplesMap
>> Bob Scanlon
>> Revelytix
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Boris Villazón Terrazas<bvillazon@fi.upm.es>  wrote:
>> Hi Robert, Souri
>>
>> Alex modified the image following your comments
>>
>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png
>>
>> Souri, I'll update the images, I'll try to do it by tonight
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Boris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15/03/2011 15:59, Robert Scanlon wrote:
>>> Hi Alexander,
>>>
>>> This looks very good.  Here's a few comments/suggestions:
>>> 	• It looks like tableOwner is missing in TripleMapClass -- that should be an optional property, per ISSUE-23
>>> 	• It looks like inverseExpression is missing in SubjectMapClass and ObjectMapClass; suggest inserting above graph properties to keep those together at the end or property listings  (it's in PredicateMapClas but without a range)
>>> 	• RefObjectMapClass.joinCondition range is a string (currently missing)
>>> 	• Suggest moving template up under column in SubjectMapClass and ObjectMapClass, for aesthetic reasons (it's one of 3 alternatives to specify a subject or object, the other 2 are at the top of the property list)
>>>
>>> Bob Scanlon
>>> Revelytix
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Alexander De Leon<me@alexdeleon.name>  wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> I created a UML class diagram of the R2RML syntax: http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png
>>>
>>> Any comments/corrections?
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On 15/03/2011, at 00:25, Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Souri
>>>>
>>>> On 14/03/2011 17:21, Souripriya Das wrote:
>>>>> Latest Editors' draft (v 1.42): http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/
>>>>>
>>>>> Worked on the R2RML document to address the following issues to make it ready for publishing:
>>>>>       • Issue-22: added note to Sec 1.3
>>>>>       • Issue-24: changed "child." to "{child.}" and added a note about allowing complex join conditons.
>>>>>       • Issue-26: added rr:unnamedGraph IRI as a possible value for rr:graph property to indicate that the generated triples should be stored in the unnamed graph (besides storing them into specified named graphs, if any).
>>>>>       • Issue-31: Changed "blank node label" to "blank node identifier"
>>>>> Issues to be addressed:
>>>>>       • Figures need to be consistent with the current text. (Boris, could you please upload the latest figures or send us the pointers.)
>>>> I will upload the figures, once I update them.
>>>> In addition, Alex is creating a new figure that describes the R2RML specification, we will send you this figure.
>>>>
>>>>>       • Issue-28: Needs a test case. (Boris, could you please add a test case.)
>>>> Done, in a previous "Test Cases" email.
>>>>
>>>> Boris
>>>
>>

Received on Thursday, 17 March 2011 13:51:44 UTC