- From: Boris Villazón Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:51:14 +0100
- To: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
- CC: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hi Souri I updated the figures on the repository. They should be ok now ... apologies for the delay. I also included the UML class diagram (R2RML.png), so you can include it into the document, probably at the beginning. Thanks Boris On 16/03/2011 0:24, Alexander De Leon wrote: > Thanks for the comments Robert. > I changed to a different drawing tool because Violet UML wasn't exporting to PNG properly. That's why there were missing properties. > > The last version of the diagram is now available from http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3663220/RDB2RDF/R2RML.png > > Regards, > Alex > > > On 15/03/2011, at 20:24, Robert Scanlon wrote: > >> fyi, just noticed these also: >> • TripleMapClass should be TriplesMapClass >> • parentTripleMap should be parentTriplesMap >> Bob Scanlon >> Revelytix >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Boris Villazón Terrazas<bvillazon@fi.upm.es> wrote: >> Hi Robert, Souri >> >> Alex modified the image following your comments >> >> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png >> >> Souri, I'll update the images, I'll try to do it by tonight >> >> Best >> >> Boris >> >> >> >> >> >> On 15/03/2011 15:59, Robert Scanlon wrote: >>> Hi Alexander, >>> >>> This looks very good. Here's a few comments/suggestions: >>> • It looks like tableOwner is missing in TripleMapClass -- that should be an optional property, per ISSUE-23 >>> • It looks like inverseExpression is missing in SubjectMapClass and ObjectMapClass; suggest inserting above graph properties to keep those together at the end or property listings (it's in PredicateMapClas but without a range) >>> • RefObjectMapClass.joinCondition range is a string (currently missing) >>> • Suggest moving template up under column in SubjectMapClass and ObjectMapClass, for aesthetic reasons (it's one of 3 alternatives to specify a subject or object, the other 2 are at the top of the property list) >>> >>> Bob Scanlon >>> Revelytix >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Alexander De Leon<me@alexdeleon.name> wrote: >>> Hi >>> I created a UML class diagram of the R2RML syntax: http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png >>> >>> Any comments/corrections? >>> >>> Alex >>> >>> On 15/03/2011, at 00:25, Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Souri >>>> >>>> On 14/03/2011 17:21, Souripriya Das wrote: >>>>> Latest Editors' draft (v 1.42): http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/ >>>>> >>>>> Worked on the R2RML document to address the following issues to make it ready for publishing: >>>>> • Issue-22: added note to Sec 1.3 >>>>> • Issue-24: changed "child." to "{child.}" and added a note about allowing complex join conditons. >>>>> • Issue-26: added rr:unnamedGraph IRI as a possible value for rr:graph property to indicate that the generated triples should be stored in the unnamed graph (besides storing them into specified named graphs, if any). >>>>> • Issue-31: Changed "blank node label" to "blank node identifier" >>>>> Issues to be addressed: >>>>> • Figures need to be consistent with the current text. (Boris, could you please upload the latest figures or send us the pointers.) >>>> I will upload the figures, once I update them. >>>> In addition, Alex is creating a new figure that describes the R2RML specification, we will send you this figure. >>>> >>>>> • Issue-28: Needs a test case. (Boris, could you please add a test case.) >>>> Done, in a previous "Test Cases" email. >>>> >>>> Boris >>> >>
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2011 13:51:44 UTC