Proposal: "private" execution mode
Bug 23935 - Proposal: New syntax for constraints
Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage
- Re: Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage
Bug 23933 - Proposal: Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries
Breaking down proposal related to constraints
[Bug 23935] New: Proposal: New syntax for constraints
[Bug 23934] New: Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage
[Bug 23933] New: Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries
- [Bug 23933] Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries
- [Bug 23933] Proposal: Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries
[Bug 23928] New: Define Error basic information "as used in these specs".
Re: [Bug 23263] New: Add output device enumeration to GetSources
- Re: [Bug 23263] New: Add output device enumeration to GetSources
- Re: [Bug 23263] New: Add output device enumeration to GetSources
RGBD and just D cameras
Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27))
- Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27))
- Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27))
Capturing constraints definitions
Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)
[Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources
[Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources
[Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources
Extensibility for constraints and registry
- Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry
- Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry
- Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry
- Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry
Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries
- Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries
- Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries
- Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries
- Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries
- Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries
[minutes] November 14 F2F
[Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources
[Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources
[Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources
[Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources
[Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources
How Firefox implements optional constraints
Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
- Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid
unknown mandatory constraints and making mandatory harder to use
[Bug 23824] New: Extraneous constraint structure described in prose...(please remove)
[Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- How to configure a camera under constraints (Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values)
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
- Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints
[Bug 23817] New: [Nit] Redundant TOC headers 8.1 & 9.1
Constraint webidl comments
Re: Getting the MediaStream associated with a video element?
Details meeting tomorrow
The mandatory constraint is a footgun
- Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun
- Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun
- Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun
- Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun
- Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun
- Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun
- RE: The mandatory constraint is a footgun
- Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun)
- Re: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun)
- Re: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun)
- Re: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun)
- Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun)
- RE: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun)
- Re: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun)
- RE: The mandatory constraint is a footgun
- Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun
- Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun
Html5 and autofocus photo
Connecting devices and tracks
Specifying multiple Optional constraints
[Bug 22338] Arbitrary changing of tracks
Regarding "Bug 22338 - Arbitrary changing of tracks"
[Bug 22366] Consider making stream URLs generated in an iframe, playable by the parent page.
[Bug 23091] Proposal: Remove CreateObjectURL
[Bug 19594] createObjectURL behaviour needs documentation, not BLOB
Updated agenda proposal Nov 14th f2f meeting
New Editor's draft v20131105
[Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry"
- Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry"
- Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry"
- RE: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry"
- Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry"
- RE: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry"
- Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry"