W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Capturing constraints definitions

From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 01:12:26 +0000
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <ABE8FAA5-9B81-4BD9-91F0-0C0FC4018146@cisco.com>

On Nov 25, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:

> Folks,
> we've been discussing constraints registration off and on for a while.
> What seems plain at the moment is that:
> 
> - We do know that compatible constraints definitions are important for apps being able to work in
> multiple browsers
> - We don't know exactly how we want to evaluate new constraints before agreeing on them
> - We do expect the webrtc WG to hang around for a while
> 
> Given all that, and the considerations Dom mentioned, I wonder if the Right Thing to do is to:
> 
> - Take all the registration stuff out of the spec
> - Make a forward informative pointer to a Wiki page of the WG where new constraints and new
> procedures to handle them will be pointed at

I'd like to see the spec clear on how new things are added in the future. For example, who can add things to the wiki and who can not. Which WG, I'd be fine with webrtc but I suspect others might not. 

> - Announce the intention to work on a registration/review document once the media capture spec
> is finished?
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2013 01:12:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:24:43 UTC