public-media-capture@w3.org from November 2013 by date

Friday, 29 November 2013

• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Breaking down proposal related to constraints Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage Martin Thomson
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode Bjoern Hoehrmann

Thursday, 28 November 2013

• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode cowwoc
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode Eric Rescorla
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode cowwoc
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode Eric Rescorla
• Re: Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode cowwoc
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode Eric Rescorla
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode Eric Rescorla
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode cowwoc
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [Bug 23933] Proposal: Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries cowwoc
• Re: Breaking down proposal related to constraints cowwoc
• Proposal: "private" execution mode cowwoc
• Re: Breaking down proposal related to constraints Stefan Håkansson LK
• [Bug 23933] Proposal: Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage cowwoc
• Re: Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage Adam Bergkvist

Wednesday, 27 November 2013

• [Bug 23933] Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Breaking down proposal related to constraints cowwoc
• Re: Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage Martin Thomson
• Bug 23935 - Proposal: New syntax for constraints Jim Barnett
• Re: Bug 23933 - Proposal: Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries Stefan Håkansson LK
• Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage Jim Barnett
• Bug 23933 - Proposal: Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries Jim Barnett
• Breaking down proposal related to constraints Stefan Håkansson LK
• [Bug 23935] New: Proposal: New syntax for constraints bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23934] New: Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23933] New: Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) cowwoc
• Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) Adam Bergkvist
• Re: [Bug 23263] New: Add output device enumeration to GetSources Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry Bjoern Hoehrmann

Tuesday, 26 November 2013

• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries cowwoc
• Re: RGBD and just D cameras Rob Manson
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Eric Rescorla
• [Bug 23928] New: Define Error basic information "as used in these specs". bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: RGBD and just D cameras Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Capturing constraints definitions Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [Bug 23263] New: Add output device enumeration to GetSources Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Capturing constraints definitions Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: [Bug 23263] New: Add output device enumeration to GetSources Martin Thomson
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: [Bug 23263] New: Add output device enumeration to GetSources Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

Monday, 25 November 2013

• RGBD and just D cameras Rob Manson
• Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) cowwoc
• Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) Martin Thomson
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) cowwoc
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry Martin Thomson
• Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) Martin Thomson
• Capturing constraints definitions Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources Adam Bergkvist
• Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27) Stefan Håkansson LK

Sunday, 24 November 2013

• [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Saturday, 23 November 2013

• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources Martin Thomson
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 22 November 2013

• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Adam Bergkvist
• [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 21 November 2013

• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Martin Thomson
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Gili
• [Bug 23817] [Nit] Redundant TOC headers 8.1 & 9.1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Martin Thomson
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Martin Thomson
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: How to configure a camera under constraints (Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values) Stefan Håkansson LK
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• How to configure a camera under constraints (Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values) Harald Alvestrand
• [Bug 23824] Extraneous constraint structure described in prose...(please remove) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23817] [Nit] Redundant TOC headers 8.1 & 9.1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Adam Bergkvist
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints Stefan Håkansson LK
• Extensibility for constraints and registry Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Gili
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Martin Thomson
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

Wednesday, 20 November 2013

• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Gili
• Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints Martin Thomson
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints Martin Thomson
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints Martin Thomson
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints Martin Thomson
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

Tuesday, 19 November 2013

• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Gili
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jim Barnett
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Stefan Håkansson LK
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jim Barnett
• [minutes] November 14 F2F Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Stefan Håkansson LK
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 18 November 2013

• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Harald Alvestrand
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Eric Rescorla
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Harald Alvestrand
• Sandboxing functions (was: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid) cowwoc

Sunday, 17 November 2013

• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Adam Roach
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jim Barnett
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Harald Alvestrand

Saturday, 16 November 2013

• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jim Barnett
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

Friday, 15 November 2013

• Re: The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun cowwoc
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: How Firefox implements optional constraints Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid cowwoc
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jim Barnett
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid cowwoc
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jim Barnett
• Re: unknown mandatory constraints and making mandatory harder to use Harald Alvestrand
• Re: The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun cowwoc
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid cowwoc
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Harald Alvestrand
• Re: The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun Adam Bergkvist
• Re: How Firefox implements optional constraints Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun Silvia Pfeiffer

Thursday, 14 November 2013

• RE: The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun Jim Barnett
• The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• How Firefox implements optional constraints Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jim Barnett
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Silvia Pfeiffer
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jim Barnett
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun Silvia Pfeiffer
• Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• unknown mandatory constraints and making mandatory harder to use Jim Barnett
• [Bug 23824] New: Extraneous constraint structure described in prose...(please remove) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23817] New: [Nit] Redundant TOC headers 8.1 & 9.1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Details meeting tomorrow Stefan Håkansson LK
• RE: Details meeting tomorrow Jim Barnett

Wednesday, 13 November 2013

• Re: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun) Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Constraint webidl comments Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun) cowwoc
• RE: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun) Jim Barnett
• Re: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun) Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun) cowwoc
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun Martin Thomson
• Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun) Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun cowwoc
• RE: The mandatory constraint is a footgun Jim Barnett
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun Martin Thomson
• RE: The mandatory constraint is a footgun Jim Barnett
• Re: Connecting devices and tracks Martin Thomson
• Re: Connecting devices and tracks Martin Thomson
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Connecting devices and tracks Adam Bergkvist
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Getting the MediaStream associated with a video element? cowwoc
• Re: Getting the MediaStream associated with a video element? Adam Bergkvist
• Details meeting tomorrow Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun cowwoc
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun Stefan Håkansson LK

Tuesday, 12 November 2013

• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun cowwoc
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun cowwoc
• The mandatory constraint is a footgun Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

Monday, 11 November 2013

• RE: Html5 and autofocus photo Mandyam, Giridhar

Saturday, 9 November 2013

• Html5 and autofocus photo Carlo TACCHI

Sunday, 10 November 2013

• Re: Connecting devices and tracks Martin Thomson

Saturday, 9 November 2013

• Re: Connecting devices and tracks Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Connecting devices and tracks Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Specifying multiple Optional constraints cowwoc
• Re: Specifying multiple Optional constraints Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

Friday, 8 November 2013

• Connecting devices and tracks Martin Thomson
• Re: Specifying multiple Optional constraints Martin Thomson
• Specifying multiple Optional constraints cowwoc

Thursday, 7 November 2013

• [Bug 22338] Arbitrary changing of tracks bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Regarding "Bug 22338 - Arbitrary changing of tracks" Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

Wednesday, 6 November 2013

• RE: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" Mandyam, Giridhar
• Re: Regarding "Bug 22338 - Arbitrary changing of tracks" Martin Thomson
• Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess Martin Thomson
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Regarding "Bug 22338 - Arbitrary changing of tracks" Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Regarding "Bug 22338 - Arbitrary changing of tracks" Martin Thomson
• RE: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" Mandyam, Giridhar
• Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Regarding "Bug 22338 - Arbitrary changing of tracks" Stefan Håkansson LK
• [Bug 22366] Consider making stream URLs generated in an iframe, playable by the parent page. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23091] Proposal: Remove CreateObjectURL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19594] createObjectURL behaviour needs documentation, not BLOB bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess Adam Bergkvist
• RE: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" Mandyam, Giridhar
• Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess Martin Thomson
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess Stefan Håkansson LK
• RE: Updated agenda proposal Nov 14th f2f meeting Jim Barnett
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess Martin Thomson
• Updated agenda proposal Nov 14th f2f meeting Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Constructors and cloning Stefan Håkansson LK
• New Editor's draft v20131105 Dan Burnett
• Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" Harald Alvestrand
• [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Constructors and cloning Harald Alvestrand
• [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Constructors and cloning Rob Manson
• Re: Constructors and cloning Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Constructors and cloning Rob Manson
• TPAC session Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Constructors and cloning Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Constructors and cloning Rob Manson
• Re: Constructors and cloning Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Constructors and cloning Adam Bergkvist

Monday, 4 November 2013

• RE: Constructors and cloning Mandyam, Giridhar
• Re: Constructors and cloning Harald Alvestrand
• Constructors and cloning Adam Bergkvist

Last message date: Friday, 29 November 2013 09:06:14 UTC