- From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 02:03:14 -0500
- To: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Hi Adam, That's for the clarification. What's the actual implementation status on Chrome and Firefox (stable)? I ask because https://code.google.com/p/webrtc/source/browse/trunk/samples/js/base/adapter.js?r=5031 still looks for srcObject, mozSrcObject and src fields. Is it safe to drop this code and access srcObject directly? Thanks, Gili On 13/11/2013 1:59 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: > On 2013-11-13 06:16, cowwoc wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've seen code for attaching MediaStream to a <video> element, but >> shouldn't we also be able to do the opposite? If the following code is >> used to attach: >> >> video.src = URL.createObjectURL(stream); >> >> how are we supposed to translate the URL back into a MediaStream? > We don't support the createObjectURL() method of rendering a MediaStream > anymore. The supported way is to use the srcObject attribute on the > media elements. > > video.srcObject = stream; > > In case you can just read the srcObject attribute to get the stream. > > This topic belongs on the public-media-capture list (cc'ed). When > replying to this message, please remove the public-webrtc list. > > /Adam >
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 07:03:57 UTC