- From: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:40:01 +0000
- To: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 14:40:25 UTC
I am opposed to this. I think that it would complicate app development and make the user experience worse. I think that we can reduce information leakage by not returning the name of the failed mandatory constraints from gUM. (Unknown mandatory constraints would be returned but they don't leak information about the user's devices. Which constraints the UA knows about depends on the maker and version of the UA, and that information is already available.) It's true that in this proposal, the app can still play 20 questions to tease out information, but I don't think that there's any way to stop that without leaving apps unable to figure anything useful out. If we want to let the user know when the app is poking around, the UA can always post a message in the chrome: "app URL is checking your hardware". - Jim
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 14:40:25 UTC