- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:20:48 +0000
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22209 Giri Mandyam <mandyam@quicinc.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mandyam@quicinc.com --- Comment #5 from Giri Mandyam <mandyam@quicinc.com> --- We discussed vendor-specific constraints during the F2F at TPAC 2012 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2012Dec/att-0196/minutes-2012-10-30.html). I believe what reflected consensus was that vendor-specific constraints be added to the IANA registry, which would allow such constraints to undergo expert review as per RFC 5226. We can reconfirm this at the next F2F however. On a related note, I do believe the spec is unclear as to what the implementation should do when a valid IANA-registered vendor-specific constraint is provided to MediaStreamTrack.applyConstraints() that the implementation does not recognize or support. I assume an exception can be raised, but I did not find specific guidance in the latest working draft. The constrainable interface proposal also defines an error callback on applyConstraints(). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2013 17:20:50 UTC