Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry

On 25 November 2013 02:08, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> I don't recommend it.

I think that Dom is pointing out that the W3C analogue of "IETF
review" is appropriate here, and draws the conclusion that updating
specs isn't impossible, even outside of this group (when we ultimately
disband, others can take over).  I'm not 100% sure that this is the
bar we need here, but it certainly seems to be the case that open
season isn't going to get us sensible results.

Can we discuss what level of control needs to be placed on new
constraints first?  If we do need to set the bar as high as Dom
suggests (and I think that it's close to that), then I see no major
issue in requiring the publication of a W3C Recommendation or Note or
Somethingorother.

Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 17:57:11 UTC