public-media-capture@w3.org from November 2013 by author

Adam Bergkvist

• Re: Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Connecting devices and tracks (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Getting the MediaStream associated with a video element? (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Constructors and cloning (Monday, 4 November)

Adam Roach

• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Sunday, 17 November)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry (Monday, 25 November)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 23933] Proposal: Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries (Thursday, 28 November)
• [Bug 23933] Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries (Wednesday, 27 November)
• [Bug 23935] New: Proposal: New syntax for constraints (Wednesday, 27 November)
• [Bug 23934] New: Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage (Wednesday, 27 November)
• [Bug 23933] New: Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries (Wednesday, 27 November)
• [Bug 23928] New: Define Error basic information "as used in these specs". (Tuesday, 26 November)
• [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Sunday, 24 November)
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Saturday, 23 November)
• [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Friday, 22 November)
• [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Friday, 22 November)
• [Bug 23817] [Nit] Redundant TOC headers 8.1 & 9.1 (Thursday, 21 November)
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Thursday, 21 November)
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Thursday, 21 November)
• [Bug 23824] Extraneous constraint structure described in prose...(please remove) (Thursday, 21 November)
• [Bug 23817] [Nit] Redundant TOC headers 8.1 & 9.1 (Thursday, 21 November)
• [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Tuesday, 19 November)
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Tuesday, 19 November)
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Monday, 18 November)
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Monday, 18 November)
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Monday, 18 November)
• [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Friday, 15 November)
• [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Thursday, 14 November)
• [Bug 23820] Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Thursday, 14 November)
• [Bug 23824] New: Extraneous constraint structure described in prose...(please remove) (Thursday, 14 November)
• [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Thursday, 14 November)
• [Bug 23817] New: [Nit] Redundant TOC headers 8.1 & 9.1 (Thursday, 14 November)
• [Bug 22338] Arbitrary changing of tracks (Thursday, 7 November)
• [Bug 22366] Consider making stream URLs generated in an iframe, playable by the parent page. (Wednesday, 6 November)
• [Bug 23091] Proposal: Remove CreateObjectURL (Wednesday, 6 November)
• [Bug 19594] createObjectURL behaviour needs documentation, not BLOB (Wednesday, 6 November)
• [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" (Tuesday, 5 November)
• [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" (Tuesday, 5 November)
• [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" (Tuesday, 5 November)

Carlo TACCHI

• Html5 and autofocus photo (Saturday, 9 November)

cowwoc

• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: [Bug 23933] Proposal: Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Breaking down proposal related to constraints (Thursday, 28 November)
• Proposal: "private" execution mode (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Breaking down proposal related to constraints (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) (Monday, 25 November)
• Sandboxing functions (was: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid) (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun) (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun) (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Getting the MediaStream associated with a video element? (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: Specifying multiple Optional constraints (Saturday, 9 November)
• Specifying multiple Optional constraints (Friday, 8 November)

Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

• Re: [Bug 23263] New: Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: Capturing constraints definitions (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: [Bug 23263] New: Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry (Tuesday, 26 November)

Dan Burnett

• New Editor's draft v20131105 (Tuesday, 5 November)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Extensibility for constraints and registry (Thursday, 21 November)
• [minutes] November 14 F2F (Tuesday, 19 November)

Eric Rescorla

• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Monday, 18 November)

Gili

• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 19 November)

Harald Alvestrand

• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: RGBD and just D cameras (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Capturing constraints definitions (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: [Bug 23263] New: Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Capturing constraints definitions (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry (Monday, 25 November)
• How to configure a camera under constraints (Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values) (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Sunday, 17 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Saturday, 16 November)
• Re: unknown mandatory constraints and making mandatory harder to use (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Connecting devices and tracks (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Constructors and cloning (Monday, 4 November)

Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry (Saturday, 23 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Saturday, 16 November)
• Re: The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: How Firefox implements optional constraints (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Friday, 15 November)
• The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun (Thursday, 14 November)
• How Firefox implements optional constraints (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Thursday, 14 November)
• Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun) (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Constraint webidl comments (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun) (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun) (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Tuesday, 12 November)
• The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: Specifying multiple Optional constraints (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess (Tuesday, 5 November)

Jim Barnett

• Bug 23935 - Proposal: New syntax for constraints (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Bug 23933 - Proposal: Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries (Wednesday, 27 November)
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 19 November)
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 19 November)
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Sunday, 17 November)
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Saturday, 16 November)
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Friday, 15 November)
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Friday, 15 November)
• RE: The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun (Thursday, 14 November)
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Thursday, 14 November)
• RE: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Thursday, 14 November)
• unknown mandatory constraints and making mandatory harder to use (Thursday, 14 November)
• RE: Details meeting tomorrow (Thursday, 14 November)
• RE: Plumb info-leak by nixing ConstraintNotSatisfiedError (Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun) (Wednesday, 13 November)
• RE: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Wednesday, 13 November)
• RE: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Wednesday, 13 November)
• RE: Updated agenda proposal Nov 14th f2f meeting (Tuesday, 5 November)

Mandyam, Giridhar

• RE: Html5 and autofocus photo (Monday, 11 November)
• RE: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" (Wednesday, 6 November)
• RE: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" (Wednesday, 6 November)
• RE: [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" (Wednesday, 6 November)
• RE: Constructors and cloning (Monday, 4 November)

Martin Thomson

• Re: Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: [Bug 23263] New: Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry (Monday, 25 November)
• Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27)) (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: [Bug 23263] Add output device enumeration to GetSources (Saturday, 23 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Connecting devices and tracks (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Connecting devices and tracks (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Connecting devices and tracks (Sunday, 10 November)
• Connecting devices and tracks (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Specifying multiple Optional constraints (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Regarding "Bug 22338 - Arbitrary changing of tracks" (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Regarding "Bug 22338 - Arbitrary changing of tracks" (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess (Tuesday, 5 November)

Rob Manson

• Re: RGBD and just D cameras (Tuesday, 26 November)
• RGBD and just D cameras (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 5 November)

Silvia Pfeiffer

• Re: Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: How Firefox implements optional constraints (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: The UNKNOWN mandatory constraint behavior is a footgun (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Thursday, 14 November)

Stefan Håkansson LK

• Re: Proposal: "private" execution mode (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: Breaking down proposal related to constraints (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: Breaking down proposal related to constraints (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Bug 23934 - Proposal: Always launch permission prompt to avoid leakage (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: Bug 23933 - Proposal: Change constraints to use WebIDL dictionaries (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Breaking down proposal related to constraints (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27) (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Extensibility for constraints and registry (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Proposal: Constraints as dictionaries (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: How to configure a camera under constraints (Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values) (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: [Bug 23820] New: Add special values for PropertyValueRange to enable preference specification in optional constraints (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why ignoring unknown mandatory constraints is not stupid (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Details meeting tomorrow (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Details meeting tomorrow (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: The mandatory constraint is a footgun (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Connecting devices and tracks (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: Regarding "Bug 22338 - Arbitrary changing of tracks" (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: Regarding "Bug 22338 - Arbitrary changing of tracks" (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Regarding "Bug 22338 - Arbitrary changing of tracks" (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Proposed new text for noaccess (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Updated agenda proposal Nov 14th f2f meeting (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Constructors and cloning (Tuesday, 5 November)
• TPAC session (Tuesday, 5 November)

Last message date: Friday, 29 November 2013 09:06:14 UTC