Re: Leakage (Re: Requirements on mandatory constraints (ACTION-27))

On 25 November 2013 11:07, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
> Even if we don't need any extra flexibility, my proposal (allowing
> developers to pass in a filter function) would provide you as much
> flexibility as you'll ever need without the risk of fingerprinting. Isn't it
> better to tackle fingerprinting in a more consistent manner as I have
> described? You could reuse this same functionality across all of WebRTC.

Your proposal doesn't change the underlying mathematics of the
situation.  It's merely a way to change the selection process.

Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 19:37:57 UTC