- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:29:17 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
* Martin Thomson wrote: >On 25 November 2013 02:08, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >> I don't recommend it. > >I think that Dom is pointing out that the W3C analogue of "IETF >review" is appropriate here, and draws the conclusion that updating >specs isn't impossible, even outside of this group (when we ultimately >disband, others can take over). I'm not 100% sure that this is the >bar we need here, but it certainly seems to be the case that open >season isn't going to get us sensible results. Dominique's proposal is "Expert Review" with Tim Berners-Lee as the Designated Expert under a process as determined by Tim Berners-Lee. "IETF review" is completely different from that. Anyone can publish an Internet-Draft, no membership or other fees required, no need to convince any Working Group to accept a proposal, and whether a pro- posal finds consensus is not ultimately determined by one person. If "IETF review" would be appropriate here, then the Working Group, by all means, should use that. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 19:29:50 UTC