- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
- Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 02:58:32 -0500
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 11/8/13 1:04 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 8 November 2013 07:31, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
>> are we only able to specify one optional constraint at a time?
> Yes. And that doesn't seem like a good idea at all. Your example of
> resolution demonstrates that it's a problem.
I think the idea is that if height is more import to you, you'd put it
first:
{
mandatory: { width: { max: 1920 }, height: { max: 1080} },
optional: [ { height: { min: 1080 }, { width: {min: 1920 } } ]
}
But I agree you still can't combine requirements, and I find the logic
hard to read to boot.
I proposed an alternative here
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2013Oct/0069.html
(near bottom).
The whole thing is just an (AND)OR array of alternative requirements:
[
{ width: 1920, height: 1080 },
{ width: { max: 1920 }, height: { max: 1080 } },
]
IMHO simpler (no mandatory/optional), easier to read, easier to
implement, and more expressive.
.: Jan-Ivar :.
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2013 07:58:59 UTC