- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:08:54 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 11/05/2013 08:28 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 5 November 2013 11:13, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >> BTW, I'll repeat what I said before in another context: if we change >> getUserMedia's behaviour, I'd much prefer to see a new call that is NOT >> called getUserMedia, and a short Javascript snippet that shows how to >> emulate getUserMedia on top of the new function (which has a new name). > I can live with that. > > If you want a proposal, I'm willing to write something up. I love specific proposals :-) (and saying that "noaccess" tracks are to be treated as muted in all contexts except for XXX seems to me to be a good way to define "no access" without creating too many new concepts.) -- Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2013 20:09:27 UTC