public-html@w3.org from September 2014 by thread

Call for Review: TTML Text and Image Profiles for Internet Media Subtitles and Captions 1.0 Nigel Megitt (Tuesday, 30 September)

[CSSWG][css-display] Updated WD of CSS Display L3 fantasai (Saturday, 27 September)

Proposal: defer converge with the URL standard to a later release of HTML Sam Ruby (Friday, 26 September)

• Re: Proposal: defer converge with the URL standard to a later release of HTML Robin Berjon (Friday, 26 September)
  • Re: Proposal: defer converge with the URL standard to a later release of HTML Sam Ruby (Friday, 26 September)
  • Re: Proposal: defer converge with the URL standard to a later release of HTML Silvia Pfeiffer (Friday, 26 September)

proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Tantek Çelik (Thursday, 25 September)

• Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Steve Faulkner (Thursday, 25 September)
  • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Glenn Adams (Thursday, 25 September)
    • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Shane McCarron (Thursday, 25 September)
  • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Brian Kardell (Thursday, 25 September)
    • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Sam Ruby (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Jirka Kosek (Thursday, 25 September)
  • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Steve Faulkner (Thursday, 25 September)
    • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Robin Berjon (Thursday, 25 September)
      • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Jirka Kosek (Thursday, 25 September)
      • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy L. David Baron (Thursday, 25 September)
  • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Ian Hickson (Thursday, 25 September)
    • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Robin Berjon (Thursday, 25 September)
      • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy David (Standards) Singer (Friday, 26 September)
        • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Brian Kardell (Friday, 26 September)
          • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Sam Ruby (Friday, 26 September)
            • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy David (Standards) Singer (Friday, 26 September)
            • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Arthur Barstow (Friday, 26 September)
            • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Sam Ruby (Saturday, 27 September)
            • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy David Singer (Saturday, 27 September)
            • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Brian Kardell (Saturday, 27 September)
            • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Sam Ruby (Saturday, 27 September)
            • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Brian Kardell (Sunday, 28 September)
            • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Sam Ruby (Sunday, 28 September)
            • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Arthur Barstow (Sunday, 28 September)
            • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Sam Ruby (Sunday, 28 September)
            • Is a CG snapshot good enough? (was: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy) Robin Berjon (Monday, 29 September)
          • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Robin Berjon (Friday, 26 September)
          • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Jirka Kosek (Friday, 26 September)
            • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Brian Kardell (Friday, 26 September)
        • Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy Robin Berjon (Friday, 26 September)

After 5 Robin Berjon (Tuesday, 16 September)

• Re: After 5 Daniel Glazman (Tuesday, 16 September)
  • Re: After 5 Steve Faulkner (Tuesday, 16 September)
  • Re: After 5 Philippe Le Hegaret (Tuesday, 16 September)
    • Re: After 5 Daniel Glazman (Tuesday, 16 September)
      • Re: After 5 Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 16 September)
      • Re: After 5 Robin Berjon (Wednesday, 17 September)
        • Re: After 5 Frederick Hirsch (Thursday, 18 September)
          • Re: After 5 Robin Berjon (Monday, 22 September)
            • Re: After 5 chaals@yandex-team.ru (Monday, 22 September)
            • Re: After 5 Frederick Hirsch (Monday, 22 September)
            • Re: After 5 chaals@yandex-team.ru (Monday, 22 September)
    • Re: After 5 Shane McCarron (Tuesday, 16 September)
      • Re: After 5 Philippe Le Hegaret (Tuesday, 16 September)
      • Re: After 5 Robin Berjon (Wednesday, 17 September)
    • Re: After 5 chaals@yandex-team.ru (Tuesday, 16 September)
      • Re: After 5 Jirka Kosek (Tuesday, 16 September)
        • Re: After 5 Daniel Glazman (Tuesday, 16 September)
          • RE: After 5 John Foliot (Tuesday, 16 September)
            • Re: After 5 Jirka Kosek (Tuesday, 16 September)
            • RE: After 5 Adrian Roselli (Tuesday, 16 September)
            • Re: After 5 Robin Berjon (Wednesday, 17 September)
            • Re: After 5 Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 17 September)
            • RE: After 5 Adrian Roselli (Wednesday, 17 September)
            • Re: After 5 Robin Berjon (Thursday, 18 September)
            • Re: After 5 Robin Berjon (Wednesday, 17 September)
        • Re: After 5 Robin Berjon (Wednesday, 17 September)
  • Re: After 5 Robin Berjon (Wednesday, 17 September)
  • Re: After 5 Jukka K. Korpela (Wednesday, 17 September)
    • Re: After 5 Daniel Glazman (Wednesday, 17 September)
      • Re: After 5 Shane McCarron (Wednesday, 17 September)
        • Re: After 5 Daniel Glazman (Thursday, 18 September)
        • Re: After 5 Silvia Pfeiffer (Thursday, 18 September)
          • Re: After 5 Karl Dubost (Thursday, 18 September)
      • Re: After 5 Jukka K. Korpela (Sunday, 21 September)
        • Re: After 5 Sam Ruby (Sunday, 21 September)
          • Re: After 5 Jukka K. Korpela (Sunday, 21 September)
            • Re: After 5 Sam Ruby (Sunday, 21 September)
            • Re: After 5 Jukka K. Korpela (Monday, 22 September)
            • Re: After 5 Robin Berjon (Monday, 22 September)
• RE: After 5 michiel@agosto.nl (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: After 5 Arthur Barstow (Sunday, 21 September)
  • Re: After 5 Robin Berjon (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: After 5 - radical idea: no editors Sam Ruby (Thursday, 25 September)
  • Re: After 5 - radical idea: test first development Sam Ruby (Thursday, 25 September)

Extensible Web Summit Berlin Robin Berjon (Tuesday, 16 September)

HTML - No Copy Option Jonathan Homer (Tuesday, 9 September)

• Re: HTML - No Copy Option chaals@yandex-team.ru (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: HTML - No Copy Option Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 9 September)

Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec Domenic Denicola (Tuesday, 2 September)

• Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec Steve Faulkner (Tuesday, 2 September)
  • Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec chaals@yandex-team.ru (Tuesday, 2 September)
    • Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec Steve Faulkner (Tuesday, 2 September)
  • RE: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec Domenic Denicola (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec Robin Berjon (Tuesday, 2 September)

Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec Steve Faulkner (Monday, 1 September)

• Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec James Craig (Monday, 1 September)
  • Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec Steve Faulkner (Tuesday, 2 September)
• RE: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec Cynthia Shelly (Friday, 5 September)
  • Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec Steve Faulkner (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec Maciej Stachowiak (Tuesday, 16 September)
  • Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec Steve Faulkner (Tuesday, 16 September)
  • RE: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo (Tuesday, 16 September)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2014 16:36:16 UTC