Re: proposal: have W3C HTML5 reference dated WHATWG URL standard rather than W3C copy

On 25/09/2014 17:46 , Steve Faulkner wrote:
> Ho hum, missed that assumed tantek's proposal was pointing to a good
> faith snapshot.

Please don't ascribe to malice, etc. People are trying to figure out a 
title that can be friendly to all. Experimenting in the snapshot itself 
is unfortunate, but I wouldn't read that much into it.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Received on Thursday, 25 September 2014 16:07:27 UTC