- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:47:01 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 16/09/2014 14:03, Robin Berjon wrote: > # We can change pretty much everything > # Unhappiness is not a fatality > # Developers > # Doing more than talking It may sound a little bit disruptive but I think the way the CSS Working Group works and operates is worth looking at... - we don't have one main spec of 1000 pages, we have modules - most of our modules are lightweight - there is no such thing as CSS 3 or CSS 4 - we don't have a strong process like the HTML WG - the Chairs are only chairing, not leading, and they very, very rarely enforce rules - we moved between 2008 and now from 30 members (10 active) and 30 specs to ~100 (~30 active) and 65+ specs - www-style is still a good contact point with the community, it's in fact often a hiring pool... - pragmatism-over-process is a core value of the CSS WG </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 13:47:24 UTC