Re: Proposal: move accessibility implementation requirements from HTML to HTML acc mappings spec

On 02/09/2014 14:40 , Domenic Denicola wrote:
> I am still pretty new to this space, so I am not sure if I have the
> particulars right, or if this is even a feasible approach. But I
> think an example of this would be, for example, expanding ARIA to
> include a "caption" role, with the platform API mappings given in
> [1], and then saying that <figcaption>s accessibility features are
> defined entirely by having aria role of "caption."
>
> I am curious whether you think this approach is feasible, and if so,
> what it would mean for your proposal.

I would be further curious to know if this sort of approach would enable 
the accessibility functionality required by MathML.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 14:21:53 UTC