- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:16:29 -0500
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, public-html@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 15:17:01 UTC
How does the current page handle extension specifications (e.g., RDFa-HTML) ? On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 15:47 +0200, Daniel Glazman wrote: > > - we don't have one main spec of 1000 pages, we have modules > > - most of our modules are lightweight > > - there is no such thing as CSS 3 or CSS 4 > > With a risk of going off track a bit, I think it will be valuable to > make sure that www.w3.org/TR/html/ still points to our best > understanding of what HTML is. With a new module approach and the > various extension specifications, one won't be able to look at a single > spec to understand what constitutes HTML. One suggestion was to > republish the entire HTML5 specification as a set of modules in the > immediate future and make sure that future modules are clear on which > HTML5 modules they intend to replace. As such, /TR/html would always > point to the most relevant modules and still present a complete set. > > Philippe > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 15:17:01 UTC