W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2014

Re: After 5

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:16:29 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOk_reFa-Mdu5X_8+REmoPPZCmGUvORwQPe6Ja6=nh1tO+FRoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Cc: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, public-html@w3.org
How does the current page handle extension specifications (e.g., RDFa-HTML)
?

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 15:47 +0200, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> > - we don't have one main spec of 1000 pages, we have modules
> > - most of our modules are lightweight
> > - there is no such thing as CSS 3 or CSS 4
>
> With a risk of going off track a bit, I think it will be valuable to
> make sure that www.w3.org/TR/html/ still points to our best
> understanding of what HTML is. With a new module approach and the
> various extension specifications, one won't be able to look at a single
> spec to understand what constitutes HTML. One suggestion was to
> republish the entire HTML5 specification as a set of modules in the
> immediate future and make sure that future modules are clear on which
> HTML5 modules they intend to replace. As such, /TR/html would always
> point to the most relevant modules and still present a complete set.
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 15:17:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:46:10 UTC