- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 10:31:07 -0400
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- CC: "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>
On 9/16/14 8:03 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: > # We can change pretty much everything > # Unhappiness is not a fatality > # Don't be partisan > # Developers > # Doing more than talking This is a great list Robin! > I outline further high-level details about how I propose we move > forward here: > > http://darobin.github.io/after5/ > > Concerning the HTML split into parts, my hope is that we do it in such > a way that makes the result more useful for developers while retaining > implementer-level details, which in turn should help support further > contributions. > > WDYT? I very much like what you say in this document! However, - and please understand I don't want to start a "partisan" type flame war - it does seem like the proposed feature split _could_ make it a bit difficult (for various stakeholders) to clearly understand "so, what exactly is the `canonical` version of features X/Y/Z - HTMLWG or WHATWG version?", although I suppose one could argue moving toward the proposed model wouldn't necessarily make things any more complicated than they are today. Anyhow, thanks for proposal! It seems like this could be a good general topic to discuss at TPAC, probably during one of the Wednesday sessions (given this is relevant to the proposed Web @ 2014 session perhaps it could be included in that session ^1). -AB ^1 https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2014/SessionIdeas#Web_and_Web_Standards_Ecosystem_in_2024
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2014 14:31:35 UTC