- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:02:49 -0400
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 09/26/2014 08:28 AM, Brian Kardell wrote: > [Snip] > Personally I would prefer if WHATWG and W3C can publish exactly same > document on bothwhatwg.org <http://whatwg.org>andw3c.org > <http://w3c.org>. I mean exactly same (maybe except visual style) so no > additional editorial effort on W3C side will be needed. Personally I > don't feel that WHATWG is currently enough stable and open body > (seehttps://whatwg.org/charter) to provide long term archival place for > specifications. > [/snip] > > Hosting an exact copy of a snapshot for reference and archival purposes > at w3c doesn't appear to bother anyone as far as I can tell, the concern > is with unnecessary forking. Seems sensible, does that make you feel > better about it? For that to work, at a minimum the W3C would need to publish such a snapshot. The last time that was done was over two years ago. A few links capturing the current state: http://www.w3.org/2014/06/webapps-charter.html#url http://www.w3.org/TR/url/ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/0492.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2014Sep/0010.html http://w3c.github.io/test-results/url/less-than-2.html - Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 26 September 2014 13:03:18 UTC