- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:20:44 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
On 17/09/2014 22:19, Shane McCarron wrote: > So, if we are going to "modularize", someone(s) need to be the > architect(s). We don't do anyone any good if at the end of the day > there is some new, awesome feature that no one can actually support in a > consistent fashion because the way it integrates isn't obvious and each > implementor does it differently. > > Fortunately, one of the things the W3C brings to the table is process. > Sometimes heavyweight, but still. And part of that process is the > document life cycle. The transition from CR to PR helps us ensure that > the spec is implementable. But even that *check* is only as good as the > underlying spec, it's relationship to the other specs it requires, and > the tests. I could not agree more. </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2014 06:21:13 UTC