- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:15:04 -0400
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, David Baron <dbaron@mozilla.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
As I understand it, ACs can vote on this now - the problem I see is that it isn't currently clear what they are voting on without the WG moving on a specific proposal. Is it possible to link to the WHATWG spec, or a copy as proposed and let that flow through the system and move it forward? On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote: > On 26.9.2014 14:28, Brian Kardell wrote: >> Hosting an exact copy of a snapshot for reference and archival purposes at >> w3c doesn't appear to bother anyone as far as I can tell, the concern is >> with unnecessary forking. Seems sensible, does that make you feel better >> about it? > > Yes > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Professional XML consulting and training services > DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com
Received on Friday, 26 September 2014 16:15:35 UTC