xml-dist-app@w3.org from June 2001 by date

Saturday, 30 June 2001

Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Mark Nottingham
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Rich Salz
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 christopher ferris
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Friday, 29 June 2001

infoset and bindings Mark Jones
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Martin Gudgin
How to validate the SOAP message against my XMLSchema Bertus van de Poll

Saturday, 30 June 2001

Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Mark Nottingham

Friday, 29 June 2001

Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 christopher ferris
RE: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Williams, Stuart

Monday, 25 June 2001

RE: Proposed Clarification for Issues 4 and 23 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Friday, 22 June 2001

RE: Proposed Clarification for Issues 4 and 23 Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com
W3C/WSDL question graham glass
Re: Proposed Clarification for Issues 4 and 23 Rich Salz
RE: Proposed Clarification for Issues 4 and 23 Andrew Layman

Thursday, 21 June 2001

Re: Proposed Clarification for Issues 4 and 23 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Infosets for XMLP vs. Intro to Infoset CR Draft Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Problems(?) with http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding and its use Martin Gudgin
Re: Proposed Clarification for Issues 4 and 23 Rich Salz

Wednesday, 20 June 2001

Infosets for XMLP vs. Intro to Infoset CR Draft Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Problems(?) with http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding and its use Mark Young
Minutes Minutes of the 23 May and 30 May teleconferences Yves Lafon
Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Martin Gudgin
RE: Proposed Clarification for Issues 4 and 23 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Issue 25 Proposal Jacek Kopecky
Re: issue 78 christopher ferris
FW: UN/CEFACT's Proposal for a New Electronic Business Working Group Dick Brooks
Re: issue 78 Rich Salz
RE: issue 78 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? Doug Davis
Re: issue 78 Marc J. Hadley
RE: Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? jerry_liu@exch.labs.agilent.com
RE: Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? Larry Masinter

Tuesday, 19 June 2001

RE: Issue 25 Proposal Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Issue 25 Proposal Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: issue 78 Frank DeRose

Monday, 18 June 2001

Number 5 used twice for SOAP-attachments contents Krishna Meduri
RE: issue 78 Doug Davis
RE: issue 78 Mullins, Chalon
RE: Issue #12: HTTP Status Codes 500 v 200 Williams, Stuart

Sunday, 17 June 2001

Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jacek Kopecky
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jacek Kopecky
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jacek Kopecky

Saturday, 16 June 2001

RE: Proposed Clarification for Issues 4 and 23 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: issue 78 Bob Cunnings
RE: issue 78 Frank DeRose
RE: issue 78 Frank DeRose
Re: issue 78 christopher ferris
RE: issue 78 Doug Davis

Friday, 15 June 2001

RE: issue 78 Frank DeRose
RE: issue 78 Frank DeRose
RE: issue 78 Frank DeRose
Re: issue 78 christopher ferris
Re: issue 78 Rich Salz
Re: issue 78 Bob Cunnings
Re: issue 78 Simon Fell
Re: Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? Rich Salz
Re: "/" End of element in SOAP 1.1 Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jean-Jacques Moreau
"/" End of element in SOAP 1.1 Hickel, Jerome
Re: Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? christopher ferris
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Mark Jones
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Mark Jones
RE: Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? Rich Salz
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Rich Salz
Re: Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: can headers modify other parts of the message? christopher ferris
Re: Issue 25 Proposal christopher ferris
Re: Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? David Ezell
Re: issue 78 Doug Davis
Re: issue 78 Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? Doug Davis
Re: issue 78 Doug Davis
Re: can headers modify other parts of the message? Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: issue 78 Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jean-Jacques Moreau
RE: Proposals to address SOAPAction header mario.jeckle@daimlerchrysler.com
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Mark Jones

Thursday, 14 June 2001

Re: Issue 25 Proposal christopher ferris
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Mark Jones
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Mark Jones
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Martin Gudgin
Re: can headers modify other parts of the message? Mark Nottingham
can headers modify other parts of the message? Mark Jones
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jean-Jacques Moreau

Wednesday, 13 June 2001

Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? jerry_liu@exch.labs.agilent.com
Multiple SOAP messages in a single MIME multipart message? jerry_liu@exch.labs.agilent.com
Re: Issue 25 Proposal christopher ferris
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jacek Kopecky
SOAP over BEEP spec available Eamon O'Tuathail
Re: Issue 25 Proposal jones@research.att.com
Re: Distinction between headers and body Jacek Kopecky
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jacek Kopecky
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jacek Kopecky

Tuesday, 12 June 2001

issue 78 Frank DeRose
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Issue 25 Proposals from the f2f Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Herve Ruellan
Re: Issue 25 Proposal christopher ferris
Re: Issue 25 Proposals from the f2f Jean-Jacques Moreau
Distinction between headers and body Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Issue 25 Proposal christopher ferris
RE: Issue 25 Proposal Williams, Stuart
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jacek Kopecky
Re: Issue 25 Proposals from the f2f Jacek Kopecky
RE: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Eamon O'Tuathail
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jacek Kopecky
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Herve Ruellan
Re: Issue 25 Proposals from the f2f Herve Ruellan
Re: Issue 25 Proposals from the f2f Jacek Kopecky
Re: Issue 25 Proposals from the f2f Herve Ruellan
RE: [soapbuilders] Element name escaping Paul Cotton

Monday, 11 June 2001

Re: Issue 25 Proposal christopher ferris
Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header christopher ferris
Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Dave Winer
Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Mark Baker
RE: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jacek Kopecky
RE: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Eamon O'Tuathail
Issue 25 Proposals from the f2f Jacek Kopecky
RE: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Glen Daniels
Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Eamon O'Tuathail
Re: Issue 25 Proposal christopher ferris
Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Mark Baker
RE: Issue 25 Proposal Williams, Stuart
Re: Issue #12: HTTP Status Codes 500 v 200 Mark Baker
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Marc Hadley
Re: Issue 25 Proposal christopher ferris
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Issue 25 Proposal christopher ferris
Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header christopher ferris
Re: Issue 25 Proposal Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Dave Winer
RE: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Williams, Stuart
Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header christopher ferris
Re: Proposed Clarification for Issues 4 and 23 Marc Hadley
Issue #93 Doug Davis

Saturday, 9 June 2001

RE: Comments and element content for serialization Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Sunday, 10 June 2001

RE: [soapbuilders] Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Matt Long
RE: [soapbuilders] Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header marwan sabbouh
RE: [soapbuilders] Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header graham glass
RE: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Larry Masinter
RE: [soapbuilders] Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Matt Long
Re: [soapbuilders] Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Dave Winer
Re: [soapbuilders] Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Doug Davis
Re: [soapbuilders] Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Dave Winer
Re: [soapbuilders] Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Simon Fell
Re: [soapbuilders] Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Dave Winer
Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Jake Savin

Saturday, 9 June 2001

Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Simon Fell
RE: [soapbuilders] Re: FW: FW: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Issue #12: HTTP Status Codes 500 v 200 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Issue #12: HTTP Status Codes 500 v 200 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: FW: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Doug Davis
RE: FW: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Daniela Florescu

Friday, 8 June 2001

Re: FW: FW: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Doug Davis
RE: Issue #12: HTTP Status Codes 500 v 200 Kasi, Jay
FW: FW: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Matt Long
Re: FW: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Doug Davis
Re: need of encoding style? christopher ferris

Thursday, 7 June 2001

need of encoding style? Gopinath M.R.

Friday, 8 June 2001

Re: Issue #12: HTTP Status Codes 500 v 200 Mark Baker
Re: Issue #12: HTTP Status Codes 500 v 200 Philip Eskelin
Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Simon Fell
Re: Issue #12: HTTP Status Codes 500 v 200 Dan Gunter

Thursday, 7 June 2001

FW: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Matt Long
Re: Issue #12: HTTP Status Codes 500 v 200 Philip Eskelin

Tuesday, 5 June 2001

RE: [soapbuilders] Element name escaping Paul Kulchenko

Thursday, 7 June 2001

Proposals to address SOAPAction header Mark Nottingham
RE: Proposed Clarification for Issues 4 and 23 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: Comments and element content for serialization Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Wednesday, 6 June 2001

RE: Unclear of How Schemas are meant to be used Paul Cotton
RE: Comments and element content for serialization Paul Cotton

Tuesday, 5 June 2001

RE: [soapbuilders] Element name escaping Andrew Layman
RE: Proposed Clarification for Issues 4 and 23 Andrew Layman
Re: Proposed Clarification for Issues 4 and 23 christopher ferris
Re: Proposed Clarification for Issues 4 and 23 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Comments and element content for serialization Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: FW: a question about mustunderstand. Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Monday, 4 June 2001

Re: Issue #12: HTTP Status Codes 500 v 200 Mark Baker
Re: Issue #12: HTTP Status Codes 500 v 200 mrossi@csc.com
RE: Comments and element content for serialization David E. Cleary

Sunday, 3 June 2001

Re: Call for review of XML Protocol WG spec issues list Simon Fell
Re: Issue #12: HTTP Status Codes 500 v 200 Mark Baker

Saturday, 2 June 2001

Re: Comments and element content for serialization Martin Gudgin
Issue #12: HTTP Status Codes 500 v 200 Williams, Stuart
Re: Comments and element content for serialization Rich Salz
Re: Comments and element content for serialization Martin Gudgin
Re: Issue 25 Proposal christopher ferris
Re: Comments and element content for serialization Rich Salz
Re: Comments and element content for serialization Rich Salz

Friday, 1 June 2001

Issue 25 Proposal David Clay
Re: Comments and element content for serialization Martin Gudgin
RE: Comments and element content for serialization Andrew Layman
Re: Comments and element content for serialization David Fallside
RE: XMLP WG Issue 12 Narahari, Sateesh
RE: Comments and element content for serialization Paul Cotton
Re: Comments and element content for serialization Rich Salz
RE: XMLP WG Issue 12 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Comments and element content for serialization Rich Salz
Spec Issue for f2f Doug Davis

Last message date: Saturday, 30 June 2001 15:07:23 UTC