W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > June 2001

Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header

From: Simon Fell <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 11:07:44 -0700
To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <b6p4it8jqsq0npor1bgo5pic8vd1d61f7n@4ax.com>
Looks really good to me. I'd much prefer this over the previously
floated proposals to remove it or make it optional.


On Sat, 9 Jun 2001 10:27:54 -0700, in soap you wrote:

>Note that there has been work going on in clarifying the SOAPAction use
>- I would be interested in hearing what you think about that
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001May/0053.html
>>If A & B are the only choices they i'd pick B, A is just an 
>>interop mess waiting to happen.
>>However, SOAPAction in its current (i.e. SOAP 1.1) form, does 
>>serve a useful purpose, my only complaint is that the spec 
>>doesn't describe very well how to use it.
Received on Saturday, 9 June 2001 14:08:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:11:36 UTC