- From: Bob Cunnings <cunnings@lectrosonics.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:25:15 -0700
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Hello, I agree with Simon... I don't see any benefit in omitting the response element or the entire envelope. I do see a penalty in the form of unnecessary complexity. RC > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:08:29 -0700, in soap you wrote: > > >I've been asked by the WG to seed discussion on issue 78 from the issues > >list [1]. > > > >The crux of issue 78 can be described as follows: > > looks good so far, > > ><ProposedRewriteOfSection71> > >The Body of a SOAP RPC message MUST contain one and only one serialization > >root. In the case of a request message, this root is the request element. In > >the case of a response message, this root is EITHER a response element OR a > >fault element. > > > >In the case of a method with a void return type and no [out] or [in,out] > >parameters, the response element will be empty, in which case it MAY be > >omitted. This will cause the Body to be empty. If the Envelope contains an > >empty Body and does not contain a Header, the entire Envelope MAY be > >omitted. > ></ProposedRewriteOfSection71> > > What's the motivation behind the last paragraph, it appear to serve no > purpose except to complicate matters. > > Thanks > Simon
Received on Friday, 15 June 2001 12:25:22 UTC