W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > June 2001

Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:59:29 -0400
Message-ID: <3B253131.6BD6480B@acm.org>
To: eamon.otuathail@clipcode.com
CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Eamon O'Tuathail wrote:
> >> It is important that the SOAPAction URI be preserved between gateways.
> SOAPAction relates to SOAP over **HTTP** - why should a different binding to
> forced to carry it when it certainly is not needed by this other binding?

Exactly my point.  If the syntax were not a new HTTP header, but instead
a parameter on the media type, then it would be much more easily
*considered* reusable between protocols.

Received on Monday, 11 June 2001 16:59:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:11:36 UTC