Re: XML Protocol: Proposals to address SOAPAction header

Eamon O'Tuathail wrote:
> 
> >> It is important that the SOAPAction URI be preserved between gateways.
> 
> SOAPAction relates to SOAP over **HTTP** - why should a different binding to
> forced to carry it when it certainly is not needed by this other binding?

Exactly my point.  If the syntax were not a new HTTP header, but instead
a parameter on the media type, then it would be much more easily
*considered* reusable between protocols.

MB

Received on Monday, 11 June 2001 16:59:43 UTC