- From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 02:33:15 -0400
- To: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
How about using the term "qualify" rather than include. That makes clear (to those few who read the namespaces rec carefully) that the usual mechanisms of default namespaces, etc. can be used to achieve the qualification. I don't thing that "including" a namespace has any formal definition.: "A XMLP/SOAP processor SHOULD >>qualify with the proper XMLP/SOAP namespace all all elements and attributes defined by XMLP/SOAP<< in messages that it generates. A XMLP/SOAP processor MUST be able to process >>properaly namespace qualified XMLP/SOAP elements and attributes<< in messages that it receives and it MAY process XMLP/SOAP >>elements and attributes<< without XMLP/SOAP namespaces as though they had the correct XMLP/SOAP namespaces. It MUST generate a fault (see section 4.4) on receipt of messages using >>SOAP/XMLP-defined elements and attributes<< that have incorrect namespaces." What do you think? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2001 02:39:43 UTC