- From: Jake Savin <jake@userland.com>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 17:20:41 -0700
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, Simon Fell <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
- CC: <soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com>
Hi Henrik, From my point of view, this is a *much* more attractive clarification of the use of SOAPAction, than the previous proposals (the deprecation or removal of SOAPAction). It addresses some of the ambiguities of the current wording, as well as avoiding breaking existing implementations and services. I endorse it. -Jake on 6/9/01 10:27 AM, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen at henrikn@microsoft.com wrote: > Note that there has been work going on in clarifying the SOAPAction use > - I would be interested in hearing what you think about that > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001May/0053.html > > Henrik > >> If A & B are the only choices they i'd pick B, A is just an >> interop mess waiting to happen. >> >> However, SOAPAction in its current (i.e. SOAP 1.1) form, does >> serve a useful purpose, my only complaint is that the spec >> doesn't describe very well how to use it. >
Received on Saturday, 9 June 2001 20:20:56 UTC