- From: Simon Fell <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:00:04 -0700
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:08:29 -0700, in soap you wrote: >I've been asked by the WG to seed discussion on issue 78 from the issues >list [1]. > >The crux of issue 78 can be described as follows: looks good so far, ><ProposedRewriteOfSection71> >The Body of a SOAP RPC message MUST contain one and only one serialization >root. In the case of a request message, this root is the request element. In >the case of a response message, this root is EITHER a response element OR a >fault element. > >In the case of a method with a void return type and no [out] or [in,out] >parameters, the response element will be empty, in which case it MAY be >omitted. This will cause the Body to be empty. If the Envelope contains an >empty Body and does not contain a Header, the entire Envelope MAY be >omitted. ></ProposedRewriteOfSection71> What's the motivation behind the last paragraph, it appear to serve no purpose except to complicate matters. Thanks Simon
Received on Friday, 15 June 2001 12:00:57 UTC