- From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 14:04:44 -0400
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Should the attached become an issue for tracking purposes? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- Forwarded by Noah Mendelsohn/CAM/Lotus on 06/09/2001 02:03 PM ----- Noah Mendelsohn To: "Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com> cc: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashokma@microsoft.com>, "David E. Cleary" 06/07/2001 <davec@progress.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>, "Rich Salz" 04:47 AM <rsalz@zolera.com>, "W3C XP" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, xml-dist-app-request@w3.org Subject: RE: Comments and element content for serialization(Document link: Noah Mendelsohn) Paul Cotton writes: >> We do not allow comments to be embedded >> within simple types. was wrong so I >> checked with Ashok Malhotra who is an >> Editor of the XML Schema: Datatypes spec. >> He says that comments can be used anywhere >> inside an element whose type is an XML >> Schema datatype. I sent a note a few days ago that I think bears on this. As far as I recall, the constructions that make clear that comments are ignored are in the Schema Structures spec, not datatypes. I don't have the text available, but structures basically says that validation is done on the _character_ children of an element or attribute, skipping comments, etc. I _think_ that datatypes is silent on how you get from text in an XML document to a string of charcters to validate against a type to integer. So, I think the general conclusion is right, but we may need a bit of SOAP spec cleanup to get all the details in there. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sunday, 10 June 2001 19:41:11 UTC