- From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 14:04:44 -0400
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Should the attached become an issue for tracking purposes?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036
Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Forwarded by Noah Mendelsohn/CAM/Lotus on 06/09/2001 02:03 PM -----
Noah
Mendelsohn To: "Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com>
cc: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashokma@microsoft.com>, "David E. Cleary"
06/07/2001 <davec@progress.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>, "Rich Salz"
04:47 AM <rsalz@zolera.com>, "W3C XP" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
Subject: RE: Comments and element content for serialization(Document link: Noah
Mendelsohn)
Paul Cotton writes:
>> We do not allow comments to be embedded
>> within simple types. was wrong so I
>> checked with Ashok Malhotra who is an
>> Editor of the XML Schema: Datatypes spec.
>> He says that comments can be used anywhere
>> inside an element whose type is an XML
>> Schema datatype.
I sent a note a few days ago that I think bears on this. As far as I
recall, the constructions that make clear that comments are ignored are in
the Schema Structures spec, not datatypes. I don't have the text
available, but structures basically says that validation is done on the
_character_ children of an element or attribute, skipping comments, etc. I
_think_ that datatypes is silent on how you get from text in an XML
document to a string of charcters to validate against a type to integer.
So, I think the general conclusion is right, but we may need a bit of SOAP
spec cleanup to get all the details in there.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036
Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sunday, 10 June 2001 19:41:11 UTC