- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:23:45 +0200
- To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- CC: Frank DeRose <frankd@tibco.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Dug, I agree, but this is not RPC specific, isn't it? Doug Davis wrote: > [...] I believe it is > valid to put multiple RPC calls in the body (each one being > its own body element) - if fact you can even put each RPC > as a separate header - there are lots of ways to do it. > But, the spec doesn't tell you how to handle things like > faults (or multiple faults) or rollback if the 3rd rpc > fails. So, if someone wants to do this it would be up > to them to decide how these issues are handled - as long > as they conform to the spec. Jean-Jacques.
Received on Friday, 15 June 2001 07:23:53 UTC