Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4

+1 (or however many you're willing to give me - I like this a lot, and
personally think the W3C should give us a hard time if we don't do this)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Martin Gudgin'" <marting@develop.com>
Cc: "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 1:21 AM
Subject: RE: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4


> Martin,
>
> Thanks for doing this. Personally I like the general style of this. I like
> the precision the use of Infoset terminology gives. I also like the sense
of
> structure that describing things in this way gives - exemplified mostly
> through the bulleted lists. It reminds me a bit of the style in the Schema
> Structures spec. [1] where the repeating style of various component
> definition sets a rigourous tone and helps folks navigate their with
through
> the document - of course I think we probably have much less to describe
:-)
> - but I do like the style.
>
> Regards
>
> Stuart Williams
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:marting@develop.com]
> > Sent: 20 June 2001 21:39
> > To: XML Protocol Discussion
> > Subject: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4
> >
> >
> > I've rewritten Section 4 of the SOAP 1.1[1] note in terms of the XML
> > Infoset[2]. The rewritten section can be found at[3]. My motivation was
to
> > clean up that section, make sure each 'thing' is only defined once and
> > hopefully make things unambiguous. While doing so I found a couple of
> > inconsistencies. These are called out in 'ednote' style ( yellow
> > background ).
> >
> > Comments, suggestions, flames etc to the usual address.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Martin Gudgin
> > DevelopMentor
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap/
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/
> > [3] http://marting.develop.com/xmlp/spec_sec4.html
> >
>
>

Received on Friday, 29 June 2001 12:56:03 UTC