Hypermedia vs. data
BTP without RM scenario
RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Servic es)
Hypermedia workflow
FYI: ANN: Distributed Registry for Web Services
- Re: FYI: ANN: Distributed Registry for Web Services
- RE: FYI: ANN: Distributed Registry for Web Services
P3P Hairball??
[MTF] Conf Call Minutes 12/18/02
ebXML Messaging Specification link
RE: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestrati on
RE: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestration
RE: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestration
Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestration
WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
- Re: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
- RE: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
- RE: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
RM and RC, our experience
Correction - RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
RE: Message Expiry
eBusiness Web Services (ebXML)
Reliable Messaging Summary - Cont
RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels o f Rel iable Messaging)
RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
Message Expiry & the WS Architecture
RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- Re: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- Re: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Reliable Messaging reference
- RE: Reliable Messaging reference
- Is (sender-side) persistent storage needed for Reliable Messaging ??
Closing issue X
- RE: Closing issue X
- RE: Closing issue X
- RE: Closing issue X
- RE: Closing issue X
- RE: Closing issue X
- RE: Closing issue X
[MTF] Agenda for 12/18 MTF Call
Regrets 12/12 telecon.
RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agendafor 5 December WSA telcon)
Possible Regrets for Thu telcon
Reliable Web Services
- Re: Reliable Web Services
- Re: Reliable Web Services
- RE: Reliable Web Services
- RE: Reliable Web Services
- Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Re: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Re: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Re: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Re: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Re: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliable Web Services
Fwd: Semantics and Web services
Re: initial (ROUGH!) draft of extension fwk doc
proposed response to XMLP response to issue #390
[ADMINISTRIVIA] X-Archived-At: header in the mailing lists
RE: Roles for Reliability - (was RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?)
RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
RM Roles: RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: RM Roles: RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: RM Roles: RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
Roles for Reliability - (was RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?)
RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
"Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- Re: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- Re: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
Key Quality and Protection Assertions and WDSL
Re: definition of web services in "web services architecture"
RE: UDDI's UUIDs issue
RE: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
RE: "Web service" or "web service"
RE: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
- Re: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics