- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:04:45 -0500
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 4:49 PM > To: Champion, Mike > Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: Re: Hypermedia workflow > > > Sure, nothing's preventing the rules from being shared. It's just > optional. Perhaps there's some legal reason to share it, I don't > know. > > Anyhow, it's not needed in order to *execute* the process, which seems > to me to be the important thing. OK, I see your point and have no problem with it. I personally think that main point of a web service choreography is to *describe* it, and the execution is an "implementation detail" for the purposes of this WG. Nevertheless, I agree that the execution could be done RESTfully and [putting on my Software AG hat] it is a very good idea to build choreographed services using a scalable/reliable XML repository with an HTTP interface :-)
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 19:04:47 UTC